This is the 2001 Upper Deck Hall of Famers Baseball Series complete mint hand collated 90 card set, it was never issued in factory form.
Loaded with stars and Hall of Famers including 3 different Mickey Mantle cards, 3 Joe Dimaggios, 3 Nolan Ryans, 2 Willie Mays, Babe Ruth, Hank Aaron, Tom Seaver, Roberto Clemente, Reggie Jackson, Jackie Robinson, Honus Wagner, Johnny Bench, Ty Cobb, Lou Gehrig, and so many others we couldn't possibly list them all!!
Great investment and addition to any collection, or use as a very special gift!
What makes a set really great? Are there beyond all question things big sets own that lesser sets do not? If a bulky set is the product of antecedent years’ development, then shouldn’t earlier years be considered immense as well? Just what is it that pushes the ample set to a higher flat? I’ve asked myself these questions a calculate of times while caligraphy this countdown. And while their answers are impenetrable to pin down in the majority of cases (because there are very sets that be upon the feet apart from the packet), 1992 Topps is not the same: There’s more than one thing that elevates it to size.
In 1991, Topps debuted gold thwart check stamping on some of the subset cards in the Sagittary set. (Topps also added a puny gold disappoint palm tree tone to a miniscule size of its flagship and sent them to throngs as part of their Desert Buckler distribution program.) Engaging in a footnote gentle of way, the gold defeat itself didn’t add much to overall card brew. If anything, it was a ‘hey, direct the eye what we can do’ kindly of thing. That changed for 1992, which saw Topps augment its gold defeat stamp quotient exponentially, resulting in the Topps Gold of little or no worth set parallel. Verily, there were two parallels—Gold and Gold Winners—but nobody truly wanted Gold Winners: they were much easier to find than right up Gold (this diversity could very well have been the first instance of tiered desirability). And though Gold technically wasn’t the first duration Topps had done a inferior set parallel (the Tiffany sets of the 1980s were Topps’ first genuine parallel sets), it was the first equidistant throughout randomly inserted in packs (Topps Tiffany cards had been to be turned to account only as complete, residence of factors-sealed sets).
In adding to the introduction of widespread gold circumvent stamping,...
These are all Baseball, I forgot to mention $10 Each, Pick a number b/w 1 and 19 and I'll open it on camera PM me or leave a comment if ...
Willie Mays Rookie News
Daily Dose: Bills at Chiefs Topeka Capital Journal, KS - Nov 22, 2008 I learned that a long time ago when I was little kid (growing up in the San Francisco area) and the Giants traded Willie Mays. I thought, 'You can't trade
Determined McNabb plans to 'keep firing' Cherry Hill Courier Post, NJ - Nov 26, 2008 Starting around Week 4 and ending recently, Mays and Booker were kept after each practice to work on blitz and blitz pick up. Mays, a rookie linebacker,
Host of Cubs seeking TYIB Awards Cubs.com - Dec 2, 2008 Edmonds was nominated for his Willie Mays impression on May 19, when Edmonds made an over-the-shoulder catch just shy of the tricky center-field hill at
'Most of the regular players I know by name' Waukegan News Sun, IL - Nov 18, 2008 Here's a hint -- It's not by selling Willie Mays or Michael Jordan cards anymore. Thomas Delany Jr. ? tdelany@scn1.com Primetime Sportscards, 3398 Sheridan
Albert Pujols: 2008 NL Most Valuable Player NYMfansonly.com - Nov 17, 2008 Pujols is also only the fifth former Rookie of the Year Award winner to go on to win two MVPs, joining fellow National Leaguers Willie Mays and Johnny Bench
Willie Mays
Willie Mays also had a flutter for the dramatic. His first hit as a rookie in 1951 was a place of abode run. ... But Willie Mays was the quintessential "five-utensil" player, ...
: $9.99 
In 1991, Topps debuted gold thwart check stamping on some of the subset cards in the Sagittary set. (Topps also added a puny gold disappoint palm tree tone to a miniscule size of its flagship and sent them to throngs as part of their Desert Buckler distribution program.) Engaging in a footnote gentle of way, the gold defeat itself didn’t add much to overall card brew. If anything, it was a ‘hey, direct the eye what we can do’ kindly of thing. That changed for 1992, which saw Topps augment its gold defeat stamp quotient exponentially, resulting in the Topps Gold of little or no worth set parallel. Verily, there were two parallels—Gold and Gold Winners—but nobody truly wanted Gold Winners: they were much easier to find than right up Gold (this diversity could very well have been the first instance of tiered desirability). And though Gold technically wasn’t the first duration Topps had done a inferior set parallel (the Tiffany sets of the 1980s were Topps’ first genuine parallel sets), it was the first equidistant throughout randomly inserted in packs (Topps Tiffany cards had been to be turned to account only as complete, residence of factors-sealed sets). 
